Pearce v Ove Arup Partnership Ltd & others (Record no. 50050)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01470cab a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS57376 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u79589 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Pearce v Ove Arup Partnership Ltd & others |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1997 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | All England Law Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | [1997] 3 All ER 31-44(14) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ChD 7 March 1997. In 1986 P created drawings as part of a diploma exercise. The action was against O, a firm of UK civil engineers, and three other parties from Holland, who together formed the planning and design team for a dutch building built between 1990 and 1993. P claimed that his plans had been reproduced in this construction. The dutch defendants applied to strike out the claim on grounds that a breach of foreign copyright was not justiciable in English courts. P contended that it was justiciable under law covered by the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982. "Held" that whilst jurisdiction was allowed, the action would be struck out against all defendants as an abuse of process - the evidence being purely speculative. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CIVIL JURISDICTION AND JUDGEMENTS ACT 1982 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | COPYRIGHT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EVIDENCE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JURISDICTION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PEARCE V OVE ARUP PARTNERSHIP LTD AND OTHERS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 14/07/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS57376 | 79589-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |