Rank Xerox (UK) Ltd v Johnson (VO) (Record no. 538)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01497cab a2200205 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS36901 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1986 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u968 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Rank Xerox (UK) Ltd v Johnson (VO) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1986 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | 279 (6301) 13 September 1986, p1096-1099 (3) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | LVC(572-575/1984). These appeals relate to whether two office blocks, originally occupied separately, but now occupied by the appellant company for office use, were one hereditament. The appeals rose from three proposals made by Richard Ellis on the two blocks. In the first two proposals they sought an alteration in the valuation list and a reduction of the assessments on the grounds that they were incorrect and excessive. A further proposal was made saying that the "existing assessments should be merged and reduced" and "that the two buildings form one hereditament and the existing assessments are excessive, incorrect and bad in law." The Greater London Valuation Court decided the appeals resulting from the proposals on 31 January 1984, dismissing all three appeals and confirming the assessments in the valuation list. Rank Xerox, the appellant company appealed. The ratepayers contended that the appeal blocks were contiguous because they were touching. Alternatively, if they were not |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | OFFICES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | UXBRIDGE |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | RATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS36901 | 968-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |