British Telecommunications plc v Central (VO) (Record no. 54780)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01722cab a2200313 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS58958 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u86977 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | British Telecommunications plc v Central (VO) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1998 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Rating & Valuation Reporter |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1998) RVR 86-97(12) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CLVT 19 March 1998. Appeals arose from proposals made by BT on 14 July 1995 disputing the rateable values of £520m in the central rating list for England and £32m in the central rating list for Wales, on the grounds that the assessments were incorrect and excessive and bad in law. The rateable assets comprising mainly the plant and machinery in the highway but also buildings and other properties used in connection with that plant and machinery were the subject of the two appeals and were referred to as cumulo assessments. The method of valuation was the main difference between the parties. "Held" that the method of valuation likely to produce the most reliable estimate of annual value was the receipts and expenditure method. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CHINA LIGHT AND POWER CO V RATING COMMISSIONER |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CONTRACTORS BASIS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DAWKINS (VO) V ROYAL LEAMINGTON SPA |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ENERGIS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | KINGSTON UNION ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE V METROPOLITAN WATER BOARD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1988 SCH 6 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MERCURY |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RATING LISTS (VALUATION DATE) ORDER 1992 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RENTAL VALUE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TORCH COMMUNICATIONS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | VALUATION FOR RATING (PLANT AND MACHINERY) REGULATIONS 1994 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | RATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 23/06/1998 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS58958 | 86977-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |