Cromwell Developments Ltd v Godfrey and others: Same v Wright and others (Record no. 55852)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01839cab a2200289 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ABS59319
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u88419
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Cromwell Developments Ltd v Godfrey and others: Same v Wright and others
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 1998
350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE]
Price 0
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [1998] 33 EG 72-76(5)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. CA 8 April 1998. The defendants were granted two leases of adjoining office suites: 32A and 32B. In 1984 both leases were assigned to CBL. CBL were dissolved in 1987 and the leases became vested in the Crown; the plaintiff landlords (C) were unaware of these events. The leases were disclaimed in 1993. CBTS, who were controlled by the same person who controlled CBL, were tenants of unit 28 in the same building and paid the rent of 32A and 32B from about 1989 until September 1990. Thereafter arrears began to arise and a liquidator was appointed. C`s claims for arrears in the two consolidated actions, one against the original tenants and the other against the defendants as being liable under an indemnity, were dismissed by the county court on the ground that the leases had terminated either by forfeiture or re-entry. C appealed. "Held" C did not manifest an intention to forfeit the leases; their conduct was not equivocal and, there was no constructive re-entry. Appeal allowed.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element DISCLAIMER OF LEASE
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element FORFEITURE
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element HINDCASTLE LTD V BARBARA ATTENBOROUGH ASSOCIATES LTD
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LANDLORD AND TENANT
9 (RLIN) 6252
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LIABILITY
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LONDON & COUNTY (A&D) LTD V WILFRED SPORTSMAN LTD
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ORIGINAL TENANT LIABILITY
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element RE-ENTRY
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element RENT ARREARS
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element LANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN)
c (OCLC) 11/09/1998
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 14/09/1999   ABS59319 88419-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report