Dilieto v Ealing LBC (Record no. 57373)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01612cab a2200241 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS59844 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1998 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u90483 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Dilieto v Ealing LBC |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1998 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Weekly Law Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | [1998] 3 WLR 4 December 1998, 1403-1419(17) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | QBD 2 April 1998. In 1964 the defendant D was granted planning permission for a warehouse subject to the condition that the yard was kept clear at all times. in 1994 a planning officer found that the yard was being used in breach of planning permission. Having failed to comply with a breach of condition notice the defendant was convicted, fined and ordered to pay costs. On appeal by way of case D contested that the breach of condition notice was invalid as the condition was so vague as to be a nullity and it had been served after the 10 year limitation period for enforcement had expired. The court allowed the appeal stating that the defendants contention of the notice being invalid due to being vague was unfounded but that he was entitled to contest it on the ground that it was out of time. The conviction, fines and order to pay costs were quashed, the case was remitted to the magistrates` courts for rehearing. Appeal allowed with costs. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BREACH OF CONDITION NOTICES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DILIETO V EALING LBC |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | FAILURE TO COMPLY |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S171(B)(3) |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | VALIDITY OF NOTICE |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 23/12/1998 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS59844 | 90483-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |