The reasons why clients prefer to procure more projects based on design-bid-build than design-and-build (Record no. 65731)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01563cam a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS63270 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u110226 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Ling, Y |
| 245 #4 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The reasons why clients prefer to procure more projects based on design-bid-build than design-and-build |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2000 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Journal of Construction Procurement |
| Volume/sequential designation | 6(2) November 2000, 135-146(12) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Design-and-build (DB) projects are known to achieve better performance than design-bid-build (DBB) projects. However, the use of DB is still not widespread in many countries. A survey was carried out to find out why clients in Singapore, are not procuring more projects using DB. This survey was compared with a survey conducted among DB contractors in Singapore. It was found that clients did not procure more projects based on DB because they felt that they needed to bear more risks, DB projects do not have price certainty nor high quality and maintenance issues are not considered in DB projects; nor did the DB contractors agree with the clients' views. Therefore, the article concludes, contractors should try to convince the clients of the price certainty, the high quality of DB projects and the level of maintenance considered in DB projects. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DESIGN AND BUILD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DESIGN-BID-BUILD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SINGAPORE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CONTRACTORS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CLIENTS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Khee, H |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Lim, K |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 08/01/2001 | ABS63270 | 110226-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |