Surveyor negligence (Record no. 66263)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01700cam a2200241 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | WB3709-21 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u111218 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Surveyor negligence |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2001 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette Case Summaries |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2001] EGCS 21(1) (24/02/01) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | "Etam plc v Baker Almond (a firm)" ChD 29 January 2001. Etam (E) instructed Baker Almond (BA) to contact the owners of an old department store (K) with a view to purchase. BA made four offers on E's behalf, none of which were accepted. When K agreed to sell the premises to E through BA the surveyor wrote a 'letter of comfort' to E which stated, inter alia, that the price of £2.705m was justifiable as the store had an annual rental value of £125,000. A subsequent retrospective valuation, commissioned from DTZ by E, valued the store at £1.5m at the time of purchase in 1985. In 1999 E began proceedings, claiming that the advice in the letter had been given negligently. BA contended that this was not the case and that the claim was statute-barred. The claim was dismissed on the grounds that the valuation was not one that a reasonably competent surveyor could not have reached in the circumstances and that the limitation could not be disregarded as E should have sought expect advice when the alternative valuation was received in 1987. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | WB |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | COMFORT LETTERS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ETAM PLC V BAKER ALMOND (A FIRM) |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LIMITATION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LIMITATION ACT 1980 S14A(10) |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | NEGLIGENCE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RETAIL PROPERTY |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | Valuation |
| 9 (RLIN) | 6273 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-NEGLIGENCE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | News article | 01/03/2001 | WB3709-21 | 111218-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |