Tameside MDC v Barlow Securities Group Services Ltd (Record no. 66891)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02107cam a2200265 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS63796 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u112394 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Tameside MDC v Barlow Securities Group Services Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2001 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Building Law Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2001] 3 BLR 113-125(13) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CA 15 January 2001. The respondent (B) contracted with the appellant (T) to build 106 houses, with T's acceptance of B's tender constituting a binding contract until a formal agreement could be prepared. A JCT Contract was executed on 9 February 1984 by when a practical completion certificate had been issued on 7 houses. Practical completion of the last houses and the final works were certified on 17 October 1984 and 12 July 1985 but no certificate of practical completion in respect of all works was ever issued or requested. T issued a writ against B in 1996 after defects became apparent in some houses but was estopped by the HC from relying upon the absence of a final certificate as it had impliedly represented that it would not and that, subject to the issue of deliberate concealment, claims in respect of the first two practical completion certificates were time barred. T appealed these issues and two others regarding a breach of contract by T for failing to issue a final certificate. "Held": there had been no clear and unequivocal representation by T; there was no reliance by B in relation to the particular estoppel; that the houses subject to the first two practical completion certificates were statute-barred; T's architect was not in breach of contract; the failure to issue a final certificate did not prevent T from bringing claims. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DEFECTS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | FINAL CERTIFICATES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JCT 1963 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JCT FORMS OF CONTRACT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LIMITATION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PRACTICAL COMPLETION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TAMESIDE MBC V BARLOWS SECURITIES GROUP SERVICES LTD |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 03/05/2001 | ABS63796 | 112394-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |