Hale v Norfolk County Council (Record no. 68340)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01631cam a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS64598 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 010924n2001 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u114794 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Hale v Norfolk County Council |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2001 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Property, Planning and Compensation Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2001] 82 P&CR, 341-355(15) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CA 17 November 2000. A owned a detached house and garden that abutted a public highway on its western side. A entered into a dispute with the Council (B) over the actions of A's predecessor (D). C claimed D had dedicated a 30ft wide strip of land adjoining the eastern boundary of the highway for use as part of the public highway. On receiving planning permission to build the house he had been served with a notice by B requiring him, under Public Health Act 1925 s30, to set back the boundary of his land 36 feet from the western boundary of the highway. However, there was no evidence he had received or complied with the notice. The CC ruled in favour of B. A appealed. The CA held that it could not be presumed, from Public Health Act 1925 s30(4), that D had subjected his land to public rights of way simply because he was building on land adjoining a highway. It was also found that, in this instance, the hedge-to-hedge presumption could not to be supposed. Appeal allowed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PUBLIC HEALTH ACT 1925 S30 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HALE V NORFOLK CC |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PUBLIC HIGHWAYS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DEDICATION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HEDGE-TO-HEDGE PRESUMPTION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | Boundary disputes |
| 9 (RLIN) | 6221 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 24/09/2001 | ABS64598 | 114794-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |