Speedwell Estates Ltd and another v Dalziel and others (Record no. 69437)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01782cam a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS65055 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 020206n2002 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u116613 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Speedwell Estates Ltd and another v Dalziel and others |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2002 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2002] 02 EG 104-112(9) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | "Speedwell Estates Ltd and another v Dalziel and others" CA, 31 July 2001, examined whether the failure to provide required particulars under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 sched 3 para 6 was an 'inaccuracy' not an invalidation of the notice of claim issued by each tenant (D). D had sought to acquire the freehold of their respective houses but the notices failed to contain particulars specified by the 1967 Act, including the dates of the respective leases, incorrect names of the parties, rateable values of the houses and no information regarding financial limits and the relevant valuation provision of the act. The landlords (S) contended that these invalidated the notices. The county court judge accepted the S's contentions and D appealed. CA dismissed the appeal; the failure to provide the correct details of the relevant leases or the details of the rateable values would not have invalidated the notices but the failure to provide details of the periods of residential occupation, the financial information and the relevant valuation provision did invalidate the notices. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SPEEDWELL ESTATES LTD AND ANOTHER V DALZIEL AND OTHERS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 SCHED 3 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ENFRANCHISEMENT NOTICE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | NOTICE OF CLAIM |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | INVALID NOTICES |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 06/02/2002 | ABS65055 | 116613-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |