MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01815cam a2200289 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| control field |
WB3805-22 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
020206n2002 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| System control number |
(Sirsi) u116631 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Negligence |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2002 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT |
|---|
| Series statement |
Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation |
[2002]05 EG 130(CS)(02/02/02) |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT |
|---|
| Series statement |
Construction Law Journal |
| Volume/sequential designation |
[2002] 18 Const LJ 481-494(14) |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT |
|---|
| Series statement |
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Volume/sequential designation |
[2002} EWCA Civ 9 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
"Baxall Securities Ltd and another v Sheard Walshaw Partnership and others"CA 22 January 2002 Respondent occupiers (B) instructed a surveyor to inspect a new industrial unit, designed by the appellant architects (S) prior to taking lease. Surveyor identified a possible potential for flooding, but did not indicate the precise problem. After the unit flooded twice B brought a negligence claim against S and others. The CC held the flooding could have been avoided if B had been warned about the lack of overflows. The CC ruled that S was not liable for the first flood, as the absence of overflows had been patent, but was liable for the second flood, partly due to the absence of overflows, and partly due to a latent defect in the design capacity. S appealed, and B cross-appealed. CA held that S was not liable as the flooding was caused by a patent, not latent, defect. Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) |
|---|
| Local note |
WB |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
BAXALL SECURITIES LTD AND ANOTHER V SHEARD WALSHAW PARTNERSHIP |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
DRAINAGE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
LATENT DEFECTS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
FLOODING |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
PATENT DEFECTS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
OVERFLOWS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
NEGLIGENCE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
NITRIGIN EIREANN TEORANTA V INCO ALLOYS LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
RIVERSTONE MEAT PTY LTD V LANCASHIRE SHIPPING CO LTD |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-NEGLIGENCE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Suppress in OPAC |
0 |
