Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall; White v Chubb; Kasseer v Freeman (Record no. 70089)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02208cam a2200229 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ABS65417
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 020426n2002 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u117705
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall; White v Chubb; Kasseer v Freeman
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2002
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2002] 11 EG 156-162(7)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. CA 19 December 2001. Three appeals concerned with the validity of s20 notices served under the Housing Act 1988, and whether each notice was in a form substantially to the same effect as that prescribed by the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) Regulations 1988. In "Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall" the appellant tenant (H) appealed against proceedings for possession by the respondent landlord (R) and the decision that the s20 notice correctly stated the start date of the term of the proposed tenancy. "Held": the appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the notice was 'substantially to the same effect' as the prescribed form despite giving the wrong start date of the tenancy. In "White v Chubb" the appellant landlord (W) appealed against a decision dismissing W's claim for possession and the decision that the s20 notice was invalid. "Held": appeal allowed on the grounds that the notice when read by a reasonable reader fulfilled the function it was meant to perform despite the mistaken end date of the tenancy. In "Kasseer v Freeman" the appellant tenant (K) appealed against possession proceedings by the respondent landlord (F) and the decision that the s20 notice was valid when its supplementary guidance notes contained errors or differences when compared to those prescribed by the regulations. "Held": appeal dismissed on the grounds that s20 notice still conveyed to the tenant the substance of the prescribed form despite its errors.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note ABS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ASSURED TENANCIES AND AGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCIES (FORMS) REGULATIONS 1988
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element RAVENSEFT PROPERTIES LTD V HALL
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element WHITE V CHUBB
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element KASSEER V FREEMAN
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ASSURED SHORTHOLD TENANCIES
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element HOUSING ACT 1988 S20
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 26/04/2002   ABS65417 117705-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report