Roberts (C F & M G) v South Gloucestershire DC (Record no. 70091)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02389cam a2200241 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ABS65352
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 020426n2002 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u117707
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Roberts (C F & M G) v South Gloucestershire DC
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2002
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Rating and Valuation Reporter
Volume/sequential designation [2002] RVR 63-84(22)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. LT 12 November 2001. Claimants R sought compensation for compulsory acquisition of 1.6 ha of land in connection with the construction of a section of a ring road pursuant to planning permission granted in 1988. Construction of the ring road, where passing through R's land, required mineral extraction. The parties were agreed in principle that if minerals extracted from land as part of a scheme had a value, that value should be taken into account in calculating compensation under the Land Compensation Act 1961. The issue was whether the deemed planning consent under s18 of the 1961 Act or the planning permission for the road scheme would allow the extraction of minerals as a commercial and discrete operation, without completion of the new road. R's case was that they should be compensated for the minerals, either at £400 000 based on the value for extraction to a minerals operator or £200 000 based on the value of the quantities actually extracted. The council's case was that the minerals were not relevant in valuation terms because planning permission did not exist for extraction of minerals and even if it did the materials were of poor quality. The council claimed the land only had a value for agricultural purposes and horse grazing of £17 000. "Held", compensation payable by the council to R was £17 000 because the actually planning permission was clearly for a road and not for the extraction of minerals as a commercial and discrete operation. View decision at http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/tribunals/lands/decisions/dec-acq-90-93.htm
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note ABS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ROAD SCHEMES
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element PLANNING PERMISSION
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element MINERALS VALUATION
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element MINERAL EXTRACTION
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LAND COMPENSATION ACT 1961
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ROBERTS (C F & M G) v SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE DC
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.courtservice.gov.uk/tribunals/lands/decisions/dec-acq-90-93.htm">https://www.courtservice.gov.uk/tribunals/lands/decisions/dec-acq-90-93.htm</a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 26/04/2002   ABS65352 117707-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report