Geoff Brewer of Brewer Consulting considers an architect's duty to inspection (Record no. 70092)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01731cam a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS65302 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 020426n2002 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u117708 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Brewer, G |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Geoff Brewer of Brewer Consulting considers an architect's duty to inspection |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2002 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Contract Journal |
| Volume/sequential designation | 413(6372) 10 April 2002, 22(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Considers the extent to which an architect has a duty to inspect or supervise a contractor's work. Reviews the recent case "Consarc Design v Hutch Investments" (2002) in which Hutch contended that a floor slab was not properly scarified before the screed was laid. Hutch held architects Consarc responsible for failing to inspect the floor slab, and relied on the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Standard Form of Agreement 1992 Stage K08 which specifies that the architect should at intervals inspect the progress of construction works. The judge found this to be a vague statement and took the view that inspection is not as important as supervision and that the level of supervision required of by an architect depends on his confidence in the contractor. In addition, an architect's duty to inspect the works does not amount to a warranty that the works will be carried out without defects. On this basis, Consarc was not held liable for negligence. Case law. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DUTY OF INSPECTION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SUPERVISION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ARCHITECTS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DUTY OF INSPECTION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CORFIELD V GRANT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EAST HAM CORPORATION V BERNARD SUNLEY & SONS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SUTCLIFFE V CHIPPENDALE & EDMONDSON |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 26/04/2002 | ABS65302 | 117708-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |