No cause for complaint (Record no. 71196)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01979cam a2200241 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ABS65937
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 020923n2002 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u119796
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Murdoch, S.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title No cause for complaint
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2002
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation (0229) 20 July 2002, 148(1)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. A recent High Court decision on a rent review arbitration, confirmed that challenging an arbitration award is not easy. In "Checkpoint Ltd v Strathclyde Pension Fund"[2002] the parties were unable to agree the new rent, and in accordance with the rent review clause, the matter was referred to a chartered surveyor with specific experience in the market of a storage and distribution depot. He argued for an annual rent of £440 000 on behalf of the landlord due to comparitive examples. The tenants surveyor however advised the tenant to submit a rent of £273 000 pa based on view that comparisons had not been made with like examples. The arbitrator awarded the full figure to the landlord. The tenant appealed arguing there had been irregularities in the proceedings. The appeal failed as judge argued that the arbitrator had not acted unjustly when using personal experience of the market. Judge decided that irregularities in arbitration procedure have to be non-substantive, serious and cause substantial injustice to challenge a ruling. Secondarily the judge refused leave to appeal, giving no reasons, stating that the Human Rights Act did not affect the ruling to withhold reasons.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note ABS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element CHECKPOINT LTD V STRATHCLYDE PENSION FUND
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ARBITRATION ACT 1996
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ARBITRATION ACT 1979
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element RENT REVIEWS
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element MANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 23/09/2002   ABS65937 119796-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Journal article