Richards and Richards v Somerset CC (Record no. 71868)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02713cam a2200217 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ABS66233
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 030103n2002 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u120903
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Richards and Richards v Somerset CC
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2002
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Rating and Valuation Reporter
Volume/sequential designation [2002] RVR 328-352(25)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. LT 2 September 2002. Determination of compensation payable for a small parcel of land acquired under a purchase order in 1999. The claimants (R) claimed compensation of £4.8m on the grounds that the land had a ransom value relative to development of other land whilst the Council (S), although acknowledging that the land had hope value above existing use, put the value at £100 000. The LT determined as a preliminary issue in July 2000 ([2001 RVR 204] that the value of the land was to be determined as the open market value of R's freehold interest in the land as at August 1999. No adjustments were to be made in respect of any indication that the land was likely to be acquired by an authority possessing compulsory purchase powers nor in respect of an underlying scheme. In a subsequent decision in 2001, the LT dismissed application by S that R's expert valuation evidence would not be accepted as it introduced a different basis of claim from that agreed in July 2000.The LT in September 2002 rejected claimant 'R's valuation on the grounds that i) the requirement to complete the distributor road across the reference land in order that planning permission would be granted for the housing allocation land and for the Tesco extension was not sufficiently certain to persuade a purchaser acting in a consortium to pay£4.8m for the land, ii) there was a high degree of uncertainty and a low degree of certainty that the grant of planning permission for the housing allocation land and the Tesco extension would be dependent upon completion of the eastern distributor road iii) there was no reliable evidence to support the consortium purchase arrangements and iv) R's valuation was exaggerated, lacking in objectivity and credibility. S's valuer's sport value approach was accepted. S should pay £100 000 compensation to R. Full copy of decision is available on Court Service website http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/tribunals/lands/decisions/dec-acq-23-99.htm
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note ABS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element RICHARDS AND ANOTHER V SOMERSET CC
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element COMPENSATION
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element RANSOM STRIPS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Valuation
9 (RLIN) 6273
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/judgmentfiles/j33/ACQ-23-99.pdf">https://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/judgmentfiles/j33/ACQ-23-99.pdf</a>
Public note View decision at landstribunal.gov.uk
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 03/01/2003   ABS66233 120903-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report