Hazarding an opinion (Record no. 71992)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01737cam a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS66343 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 030129n2003 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u121160 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Akenhead, R. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Hazarding an opinion |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Building |
| Volume/sequential designation | 268(8265) 10 January 2003, 59(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Looks at recent case "Layland v Fairview New Homes"(ChD [2002] CILL1898) where parties agreed to appoint a joint expert, as the claim was relatively small and the cost to the parties of each retaining an expert would have been disproportionate to what was at stake. The appellant (L) disagreed with the experts view that the defendant (F) had not misrepresentedly sold them a flat when they knew the local council Lewisham intended to build a power and incineration plant nearby. L appointed it's own two new experts, when F won the case and L appealed, who it was judged did not add any new evidence. appeal was successful, and a trial will follow as the judge concluded L may have had a realistic prospect of establishing some capital diminution at trial by way of effective cross examination of the joint expert. The case demonstrated the disadvantages of a court-appointed expert, leading to at least one dissatisfied party, the late introduction of party-oriented expert evidence, disruption to proceedings and a disproportionately large increase in cost. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LAYLAND V FAIRVIEW NEW HOMES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | COURT APPOINTED EXPERT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EXPERT WITNESSES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PLANNING PERMISSION |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-EXPERT WITNESSES |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 29/01/2003 | ABS66343 | 121160-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |