No escaping clarity (Record no. 72201)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01952cam a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS66453 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 030304n2003 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u121491 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Murdoch, S. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | No escaping clarity |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (0302) 11 January 2003, 102(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Discusses recent cases concerning Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s42 notice requirements. In "St Ermin's Property Co v Tingay" (Chd Abs66081), agreeing with an earlier judgment "Viscount Chelsea and another v Hirshorn" (County Court Abs58748) it was decided that the need for a s42 notice to be signed personally by the tenant was inescapable and in this case the notice signed by the tenant's son under a power of attorney was invalid. In "Wellcome Trust Ltd v Bellhurst Ltd" (CA [2002] 32 EG 90) the CA was asked to rule on the validity of a s42 notice served by the respondent (B) which held the relevant underlease on trust for the occupier. The notice had not been served on a particular tenant nor on the intermediate landlord. The tenant it was claimed, although a party to the underlease, was not a third party for the purposes of the Act. CA agreed that the statute did not cover a third party who has no rights and obligations under the law. Further, where Sched 11 para 2 of the 1993 Act applies, the validity of the notice is not affected. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S41 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S42 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 SCHED 11 PARA 4 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ST ERMINS PROPERTY CO V TINGAY |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WELLCOME TRUST LTD V BELLHURST LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | VISCOUNT CHELSEA AND ANOTHER V HIRSHORN |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ENDURING POWERS OF ATTORNEY ACT 1985 S3(2) |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 04/03/2003 | ABS66453 | 121491-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |