Mount Cook Land Ltd v Rosen (Record no. 72382)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01740cam a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | X121790 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 030331n2003 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u121790 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Mount Cook Land Ltd v Rosen |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2003] 10 EG 165-168(4) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | County Court, 15 October 2002. Claimant landlord (M) was the freehold owner of the building containing defendant tenant's (R) flat. The former lessee (B) contracted to sell the lease to R and served an initial notice under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s42. He later assigned to R the lease and the benefit of the s42 notice which specified that R proposed to pay a premium of £100 000. M denied the validity of the notice as it failed to specify a realistic premium, having regard to "Viscount Chelsea v Morris" (CA, Abs60002) and issued proceedings seeking a declaration claiming that the notice was invalid as the suggested premium of £100 000 was unrealistic. M's valuation of the premium was £287 000 and R's valuer considered the premium to be about £200 000 at the time of serving the notice. "Held" judgment in favour of M. The s42 notice was invalid as the statutory provision in s42(3)(c) of the 1993 Act requires the tenant to specify a realistic premium in the initial notice which £100 000 was not. A realistic premium is one that can be justified by valuation evidence. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MOUNT COOK LAND LTD V ROSEN |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | INITIAL NOTICES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | VISCOUNT CHELSEA V MORRIS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S42 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PREMIUMS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASEHOLD REFORM-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 05/09/2003 | X121790 | 121790-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |