What's the damage? (Record no. 72452)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01289cam a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS66542 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 030404n2003 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u121906 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Murdoch, J. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | What's the damage? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (0313) 29 March 2003, 113(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | In the past a party had to prove that fraud had occurred in order to dissolve a contract that had been entered into through misrepresentation or else seek to have the contract cancelled or rescinded. "Pankhania v Hackney LBC" (ChD [2002] PLSCS 262) involving the sale of a valuable development site, has elucidated the reforms introduced by the Misrepresentation Act 1967. The claimants (P) argued that the defendants (H) had misrepresented the status of the National Car Parks (NCP); the judge upheld P's claim that NCP held a lease not a licence as represented by H, overturning the rule that ignorance of the law is no defence. The judge also decided that as rescission would not have been available, there could be no damages either. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LANDLORDS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TENANTS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MISREPRESENTATION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MISREPRESENTATION ACT 1967 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PANKHANIA V HACKNEY LBC |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LAW-UK |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 04/04/2003 | ABS66542 | 121906-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |