Attribution of paintings and sale by description (Record no. 73027)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01649cam a2200241 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS66860 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 030710n2003 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u122976 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Hudson, A. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Attribution of paintings and sale by description |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Art Antiquity and Law |
| Volume/sequential designation | 8(2) June 2003, 201-208(9) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Discusses "Drake v Thos Agnew and Sons Ltd" ([2002] EWHC 294 (QB), unreported) concerning the attribution of a painting and sale by description. Claimant D purchased an oil painting from defendant (A) through agent (C) for £1 500 000. D alleged that the painting was sold as a painting by Van Dyck and brought a claim for damages against A. Issues arose concerning the terms of the contract of sale. Was it a sale description as it was referred to by A as being by Van Dyck or did it come within the terms of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 s13 as argued by D? The brochure and letter supplied by A to C, which C failed to pass onto D, set out the argument and opinion and quoted contrary views over authenticity of painting. "Held" that there was no term in the contract that the painting was by Van Dyck and was therefore not a sale by description within s13 of the Act. Highlights the pitfalls of bringing alleged mis-attribution legal action on the basis of misdescription and misrepresentation. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DRAKE V THOMAS AGNEW AND SONS LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | AUCTIONEERS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PAINTING |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 S13 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MISDESCRIPTION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MISREPRESENTATION |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ANTIQUES AND FINE ART-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 10/07/2003 | ABS66860 | 122976-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |