Castlegroom Ltd v Enoch and others (Record no. 73498)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02186cam a2200229 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ABS67082
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 030930n2003 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u123772
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Castlegroom Ltd v Enoch and others
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2003
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2003] 31 EG 69-71(3
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Bromley County Court, 6 June 2003. The two defendant freeholders and the defendant headlessee (C) of a block of flats, admitted the qualifying tenants' (E) right to acquire the freehold. A day before both parties agreed the price and terms of acquisition and the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) approved them, E applied to the LVT for determination of a service charges dispute with the third defendant (D3) and no binding acquisition contract was entered into. Some months after the claimant had applied for a vesting order under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Development Act 1993 S24(3), the LVT determined the service charge dispute without resolving individual tenant service charge arrears. The judge held that the vesting order should be deferred until the time when the parties had agreed or when the LVT had determined, the service charge amount to be paid on top of the purchase price. D3 applied for permission to appeal. "Held" permission to appeal granted and appeal allowed. Sched 5 of the Act requires that any amounts or estimated amounts determined by the LVT should be aggregated with the price and not to be aggregated if they have not been determined. A vesting order under the Act S24(4)(A) could therefore be made immediately. D3 was entitled to a vendor's lien under the Act S32(2)(A), to protect its entitlement to the unpaid service charges.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note ABS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element CASTLEGROOM LTD V ENOCH AND OTHERS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element VESTING ORDERS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S24(3)
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 SCHED 5
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S24(4)(A)
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S32 (2)(A)
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASEHOLD REFORM-CASE LAW
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 30/09/2003   ABS67082 123772-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report