Avril Alderson and Hilda Alderson v Beetham Organisation Ltd (Record no. 73516)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01896cam a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS67027 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 031001n2003 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u123797 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Avril Alderson and Hilda Alderson v Beetham Organisation Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Building Law Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2003] BLR 217-224(8) |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Weekly Law Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2003] 1 WLR 1686-1695(12) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2003] EWCA Civ 408, 2 April 2003. Appellants Alderson (A) agreed to buy two basement flats in a converted property in May 1994. Eleven months later, prior to moving in they found black mould and fungus on walls of both flats. Works ordered by the respondent (B) did not stop the basement flooding four months later. A instructed a chartered surveyor who reported the flats had been constructed in breach of the Defective Premises Act 1972. He advised in November 1995 that substantial alterations be made and compensation given for spoilt purchases, disturbance and inconvenience. B did not undertake further remedial works and it was not until January 2001, when A commenced legal proceedings, that B claimed the limitation period had expired in May 2000. Judge agreed and A's claim dismissed. In April 2003 CA reconsidered this verdict, A claimed that the period did not begin at commencement of building works, but at the time B carried out the first lot of remedial works in May 1995. B argued the remedial works had not caused the flooding damage. It was held that the original damp situation had caused the problem and that B should have provided a habitable dwelling. Appeal "allowed". |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DEFECTIVE PREMISES ACT 1972 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LIMITATION PERIODS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ALDERSON AND ANOTHER V BEETHAM ORGANISATION LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ANDREWS V SCHOOLING |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HANCOCK V BRAZIER |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 01/10/2003 | ABS67027 | 123797-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |