A window of opportunity (Record no. 73847)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01720cam a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS67280 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 031125n2003 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u124457 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Hawker, S. |
| 245 #2 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | A window of opportunity |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | House Builder |
| Volume/sequential designation | 62(9) October 2003, 41-43(3) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Examines how the recent CA decision in "R v London Underground Ltd ex p Prokopp" ([2003] EWCA Civ 961, [2003] PLSCS 166) has provided a way out when a planning permission has been lost through expiry. Outlines the reasons why expiration is a common problem. Describes what developers normally do to keep permissions alive and the rare exceptions to the principle that if all conditions precedent to commencement are not complied with before construction work begins, implementation will be unlawful and, if close to the expiry date, the permission will be lost. In "Prokopp" the CA decision ruled that a s106 agreement entered into by London Underground, the developer, and Tower Hamlets LBC, the local planning authority, was implicitly upheld. The permission was no longer alive but enforcement action could not be taken because it would be irrational in the circumstances as the condition could not be complied with at the time it was drafted in 1997. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PLANNING PERMISSIONS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CONDITIONS PRECEDENT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HENRY BOOT HOMES LTD V BASSETLAW DC |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | R V LONDON UNDERGROUND LTD EX P PROKOPP |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEISURE GREAT BRITAIN PLC V ISLE OF WIGHT CC |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Planning and development |
| 9 (RLIN) | 6259 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 25/11/2003 | ABS67280 | 124457-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |