A new era for developers and planning authorities? (Record no. 74006)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01747cab a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS67357 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 040105n2003 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u124699 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Winter, P. |
| 245 #2 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | A new era for developers and planning authorities? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Town & Country Planning |
| Volume/sequential designation | 72(11) December 2003, 350-352(3) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The first in a series of four articles which examine the courts' approach to macro-political decision-making where the human rights, amenity and the general environment of the community may be directly affected. Article one looks at how decisions can be challenged in the courts by applying for judicial review which in the context of the planning system is mainly used by aggrieved third parties seeking to quash planning permissions which have been granted by local planning authorities. Stringent time limits for applying for judicial review based on the principle of the six week rule between the date of the decision and the application were abolished by "R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Burkett" ([2003] UKHL 23, Abs66375). Since the "Burkett" decision, the courts have recognised that greater caution will be needed in handling the issue of promptness. It is suggested that local planning authorities will ensure that s106 agreements are fully drafted before the matter is reported to committee. Concludes that "Burkett" will lead to an increase in the number of judicial review decisions being made. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | R V HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC EX P BURKETT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JUDICIAL REVIEW |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PLANNING DECISIONS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TIME LIMITS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 05/01/2004 | ABS67357 | 124699-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |