The lease audit clause: is it fair for tenants? (Record no. 74562)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 00941cam a2200133 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 041007n2004 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u127653 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Harris, E. |
| 245 #4 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The lease audit clause: is it fair for tenants? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2004 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Journal of Corporate Real Estate |
| Volume/sequential designation | 6(4) September 2004, 335-343(9) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Highly restrictive commercial lease audit clauses have come into vogue in commercial leases over the past decade or so. Their original purpose was to provide a means by which the tenant could verify that the landlord's accounting was reasonable and proper. The reason for its popularity with landlords is that it has evolved into a tool that allows landlords to capture funds in excess of a lease contract. Audit clauses typically relate to operating expense statements - sometimes referred to as either OPE (operating expense) or CAM (common area maintenance) statements. |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 07/10/2004 | 127653-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |