Indiana Investments Ltd v Taylor (Record no. 74758)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01697cab a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS68654 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050126n2004 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u128615 |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Indiana Investments Ltd v Taylor |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2004 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2004] 50 EG 86, 88-91(6) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Central London CC, 3 September 2004. Claimant nominee purchaser (I) had served a collective notice of enfranchisement under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 on behalf of the residential tenants of two adjoining buildings owned by landlord (T). T contended that enfranchisement was not possible because the aggregation of the non-residential and common parts of the buildings in fact together exceeded 25% of the internal area of the building and T further disputed the proper categorisation of certain areas. "Held": claim allowed. The tenants were entitled to enfranchise as the non-residential proportion was 24.11126%. Common parts and non-residential uses are not aggregated together for the purpose of the 25% proportion under the 1993 Act s4(1)(a). It is only if the non-residential proportion of the aggregate exceeds 25% that the premises cannot be enfranchised and the burden of proof that it is the case falls upon the landlord. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S4(1)(A) |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SMIRK V LYNDALE DEVELOPMENTS LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BRITTON V ESTMANCO LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RICS CODE OF MEASURING PRACTICE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASEHOLD REFORM |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 26/01/2005 | ABS68654 | 128615-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |