Blumenthal v Church Commissioners for England (Record no. 74761)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01909cab a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS68656 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050126n2004 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u128619 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Blumenthal v Church Commissioners for England |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2004 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2004] EWCA Civ 1688, 13 December 2004. Discusses when a convenant is a positive obligation and therefore outside the LT's juridsdiction. C appealed against a decision that the LT had jurisdiction to determine an application by B to modify user covenants in a lease, which specified that certain parts of a building had to be occupied by a particular organisation together with accommodation for their housekeeper employee. C argued that the covenants were not restrictive covenants and outside the LT's jurisdiction under the Law of Property Act 1925 s84. B contended that construing the covenants as positive obligations led to an unreasonable result making her in breach of the covenant when the organisation's tenancy expired. "Held": the covenants should not be construed as a positive obligation rendering the tenant in breach of covenant in circumstances which the tenant could not prevent. The parties would have made it clear when creating the user covenants if that result was intended. The covenant was restrictive and therefore the LT had jurisdiction to deal with B's application. Appeal dismissed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BLUMENTHAL V CHURCH COMMISSIONERS FOR ENGLAND |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S84 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RE BLYTHE CORPORATION'S APPLICATION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WESTMINSTER LBC V DUKE OF WESTMINSTER |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TULK V MOXHAY |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1688.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/1688.html</a> |
| Public note | View the decision at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 26/01/2005 | ABS68656 | 128619-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report | |||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 27/04/2005 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 128619-2001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |