A three-stage test provides some answers in disabled access cases (Record no. 74876)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01690cam a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS68783 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050304n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u128940 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Franklin, K. |
| 245 #2 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | A three-stage test provides some answers in disabled access cases |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Architects' Journal |
| Volume/sequential designation | 221(5) 10 February 2005, 46(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Reports on the case of "Roads v Central Trains Ltd" ([2004] EWCA Civ 1541, unreported) which has provided some guidance from the courts on the duty of service providers to take reasonable measures to provide disabled access to buildings under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA). R had difficulty changing at Thetford station on a journey to Norwich as a footbridge that connects the two platforms was impossible for him to use. The original trial judge had found it was not reasonable for Central Trains to provide a taxi but the CA disagreed. In reaching their conclusion, a three stage test was conceived, with the last question being the most difficult to answer in this instance: is the provision that has been made reasonable? It was ruled that the policy behind the DDA is not a minimalist policy of providing the disabled with some access: it is to provide access as close as is reasonably possible to the public at large. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995 S21 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ROSS V RYANAIR LTD AND ANOTHER |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ROADS V CENTRAL TRAINS LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SERVICE PROVIDERS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-DISCRIMINATION-DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION-ACCESSIBILITY |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 04/03/2005 | ABS68783 | 128940-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |