Hilton v Barker Booth and Eastwood (a firm) (Record no. 74932)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01630cab a2200181 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS68866 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050316n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u129077 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Hilton v Barker Booth and Eastwood (a firm) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2005] 06 EG 141 (CS) (1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2005] EWHL 8, 3 February 2005. Considered what duty of care a solicitor owed both parties in a property transaction where the solicitor had acted for both parties. Following an appeal by the appellant (H) against a decision ([2002] EWCA Civ 723, The Times 6 June 2002) dismissing his claim for damages against B for breach of their contractual duty. H retained B in connection with his business as a developer but in this case it had acted in the past for a purchaser of one of H's developments and knew of his previous fraud convictions. H's business collapsed following the failure to complete the sale and H brought proceedings against B. The judge found that B was only negligent in continuing to act for both parties. "Held": the appeal was allowed. B should have informed H that it could not act for him in this transaction and to advise him to seek legal advice from other solicitors and not rely on any advice already given by B. B was right not to have disclosed their client's past but the fact that it had put itself in an impossible situation did not exonerate it from liability. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HILTON V BARKER BOOTH AND EASTWOOD |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-PROFESSIONAL ETHICS-CONFLICTS OF INTEREST |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 16/03/2005 | ABS68866 | 129077-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |