Joseph Taylor v Lancashire County Council and Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs as the intervenor (Record no. 75028)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02323cab a2200241 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field L129259
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 050405n2005 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u129259
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Joseph Taylor v Lancashire County Council and Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs as the intervenor
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2005
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2005] 23 EG 142-149(7)
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Weekly Law Reports
Volume/sequential designation [2005] 1 WLR 2668-2684(17)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. [2005] EWCA Civ 284, 17 March 2005. Considers whether the notice to quit scheme under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 was incompatible with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms after the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998 because it discriminated contrary to Art 14 of the Convention between agricultural tenants facing eviction for failing to maintain holdings and tenants facing eviction for failing to improve them. Appeal by tenant (T) against respondent local authority's (L) order for possession of his agricultural holding ([2004]) EWHC 776 (QB), Abs67747). T had used his holding for business other than agricultural purposes. L served T with notice to quit under the 1986 Act Sched 3 Part I Case D. Statutory arbitration determined that the notice was valid and T's consequent challenge failed. T sought a declaration following s4(2) of the 1998 Act that the notice to quit provisions of the 1986 Act were incompatible with the Convention. "Held": appeal dismissed. T was not a victim for the purposes of s7 of the 1998 Act or the Convention. The differential treatment of tenants under the 1986 Act did not depend on their property or status within Art 14 of the Convention but solely on the content of the covenant alleged to have been breached.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note IKA150405
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element JOSEPH TAYLOR V LANCASHIRE CC AND SOS FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 14
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/284.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/284.html</a>
Public note View the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 05/04/2005   L129259 129259-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report