Scammell and others v Dicker (Record no. 75199)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01839cab a2200193 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field L129664
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 050509n2005 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u129664
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Scammell and others v Dicker
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2005
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2005] 42 EG 236-242(7)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. [2005] EWCA Civ 205, 14 April 2005. Considers whether a consent order of February 1994, compromising original proceedings concerning a boundary dispute between neighbours, was void for uncertainty. Appeal by the appellant (D) against the earlier decision ((2003) EWHC 1601 (QB)) that the 1994 consent order was void for uncertainty. Proceedings between S and D as to the precise line of the boundary between their properties had commenced in 1989. The 1994 consent order requiring respondents (S) to remove a barn and other appurtenances from D's land was declared to be void for uncertainty in a judgment of 2002, an appeal against which was dismissed in July 2003. The 2002 judgment rejected entirely S's case based on mistake and the 2003 decision dismissed both D's appeal on the uncertainty issue and S's cross-appeal on the question of costs. "Held": appeal allowed. S's claim to set aside the February 1994 consent order for uncertainty must in any event fall on its merits. It would be a complete injustice to conclude that the parties had completely failed on the grounds of uncertainty to settle their litigation at all just because of the difficulty of precisely defining the boundary line at one point on the boundary.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note IKA190505
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element SCAMMELL V DICKER
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-BOUNDARY DETERMINATION-BOUNDARIES
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/405.html ">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/405.html </a>
Public note View the 2005 decision free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 09/05/2005   L129664 129664-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report