Foxton Ltd v Thesleff and another (Record no. 75201)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01966cab a2200205 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L129666 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050510n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u129666 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Foxton Ltd v Thesleff and another |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2005] 17 EG 122 (CS) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2004] EWHC CA, 19 April 2005.Considers whether an estate agent was entitled to its sales commission when the sale of the property was not completed. Appellant estate agent (F) had agreed a multiple agency commission if it sold a property belonging to the second respondent vendor (T). F introduced a purchaser, contracts were exchanged but completion failed. F claimed its commission, which the respondents refused to pay, believing that commission was only payable upon completion, a view upheld in the county court. F appealed contending that the judge had erred in his construction of the word purchaser by reference to the Estate Agents (Provision of Information) Regulations 1991, which cover sole agency clauses, and of the phrase achieved sale price to mean the price achieved on completion. "Held": appeal allowed. The terms of the agency agreement clearly provided that the agent was entitled to his commission following the exchange of contracts. There was nothing to stop parties from relying on events other than completion to trigger the payment of the agent's commission. The achieved sale price meant the price stipulated in the contract and the word purchaser was not limited to the person to whom the fee simple absolute was transferred. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA190505 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | FOXTON LTD V THESLEFF AND ANOTHER |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ESTATE AGENTS (PROVISION OF INFORMATION) REGULATIONS 1991 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/514.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/514.html</a> |
| Public note | View the decision free of charge at www.bailii.orgƯ |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 10/05/2005 | L129666 | 129666-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |