Representative Body of the Church in Wales v Newton and others (Record no. 75226)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02153cab a2200229 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field L129714
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 050516n2005 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u129714
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Representative Body of the Church in Wales v Newton and others
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2005
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2005] 16 EG 145 (1) (CS)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. [2005] EWHC 631 (QB), 14 April 2005. Discussed the issue of whether an agreement to assign was void because it was not in writing in an underlease between the second, third and fourth defendants, as required by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s2. The claimant (R) held the reversion of an underlease of shop. The second (2) and third (3) defendant tenants sold their business to the first defendant (N) and assigned the the unexpired residue of the lease to him with R's consent. However N abandoned the shop and 2 and 3 began to negotiate the sale of the shop and reassignment of the lease to the fourth defendant (4). R then brought proceedings concerning the lease, in which the only surviving claim was under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 s17 for the fixed charges (rent and service charges) that fell due in 2003. 2 and 3 also made a Part 20 claim against 4 that he had entered into an agreement with them to take over the lease and its covenants. 4 also made a Part 20 claim on the grounds of misrepresentation and breach of conduct that 2 and 3 were unable to assign the lease lawfully. "Held": The claim was allowed and the Part 20 claims were dismissed. R's claim succeeded because N's return of the keys was not a surrender of the lease. The other claims failed because the promise to assign the lease was subject to R's consent.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note IKA190505
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989 S2
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LANDLORD AND TENANT (COVENANTS) ACT 1995 S17
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element MATTEY SECURITIES LTD V ERVIN AND OTHERS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element SINGH V BEGGS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element YAXLEY V GOTTS
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 16/05/2005   L129714 129714-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Journal article