The duty is to reason why (Record no. 75355)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01641cab a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L129934 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050606n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u129934 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Scharf, Daniel |
| 245 #4 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The duty is to reason why |
| Remainder of title | providing reasons for granting planning permission |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Journal of Planning and Environment Law |
| Volume/sequential designation | June 2005, 747-752(6) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Looks in detail at "R (on the application of Wall) v Brighton and Hove City Council" ([2005] EWHC 2582 (Admin)), one of the rare cases taken against a local planning authority resulting from the unstructured way in which a planning permission decision was reached. The judgment explained how the statutory requirement to give reasons for the grant of planning permission in the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 2003 Art 22 should be discharged and how the council in this case had failed in its duty. Looks at the implications of the "Wall" decision. Concludes that the judgment in "Wall" is an early indication about the ways in which the requirement to provide summary reasons for approval,set out in Art 22(1) of the 2003 Order, can be used to structure committee decision-making on route to granting planning permissions. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA070605 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | R V BRIGHTON AND HOVE CITY COUNCIL |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE) ORDER 2003 ART 22 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Planning and development |
| 9 (RLIN) | 6259 |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2004/2582.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2004/2582.html</a> |
| Public note | View the decision free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 06/06/2005 | L129934 | 129934-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |