Smith and others v Titanate Ltd (Record no. 75356)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01737cab a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L129935 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050606n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u129935 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Smith and others v Titanate Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2005] 20 EG 262-270(9) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Central London County Court, 18 January 2005. Considers whether the claimant landlords (S) should receive declaratory relief from the defendant company's (T) notice to acquire the freehold of the building, of which T was the sole tenant. T used the building for the business of letting out its six constituent furnished and serviced flats. T served notice on S under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 as amended by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 to acquire the freehold. S resisted the claim on the grounds that M held a tenancy within the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, which invoked a residence condition that T could not satisfy and therefore it could not enfranchise. T contended that it did not occupy the premises for the purposes of a business within the meaning of the 1954 Act s23. "Held": claim dismissed. T was not in occupation for the purposes of a business within the meaning of s23 of the Act. The lettings of the flats were tenancies and T did not have sufficient control over the flats as to be in occupation of them within s23 of the Act. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA070605 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SMITH AND OTHERS V TITANATE LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | COMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL LEASES |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 06/06/2005 | L129935 | 129935-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |