Keydon Estates Limited v Eversheds LLP (Record no. 75427)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01808cab a2200193 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L130059 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050620n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u130059 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Keydon Estates Limited v Eversheds LLP |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2005] EWHC 972 (Ch), 20 May 2005. Considers whether the diminution in value rule ("Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co" [1880] 5 App. Cas. 24) used in assessing the appropriate measure of damage for loss, could be departed from if the facts demonstrated that its application would be unjust to a claimant. Claimant investor (K) sought damages for professional negligence and alternatively breach of contract from the defendant firm of solicitors (E). E accepted its liability for K's losses following E's negligent legal advice in the purchase of a commercial property for investment. K, who purchased the property for income purposes, submitted that damages recoverable under the diminution of value rule would be substantially less than the total rent loss and accumulated interest and that another more just method of assessment should be used. "Held": judgment for the claimant. The assessment of damages was ultimately a factual exercise to compensate a claimant for a civil wrong and legal rules might have to give way to the facts of a case. In this case the diminution of value rule should not be applied in assessing the damages as it would, following the case's facts, be unjust to K. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA210605 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | KEYDON ESTATES LTD V EVERSHEDS LLP |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DIMINUTION IN VALYUE |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY FINANCE AND INVESTMENT |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2005/972.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2005/972.html</a> |
| Public note | View the decision free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 20/06/2005 | L130059 | 130059-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |