Hareford Ltd v Barnet London Borough Council (Record no. 75428)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01925cab a2200229 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field L130061
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 050620n2005 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u130061
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Hareford Ltd v Barnet London Borough Council
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2005
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2005] 23 EG 140 (CS)
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Estates Gazette
Volume/sequential designation [2005] EG 122-128(4)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Central London County Court 17 May 2005, unreported. Considers whether a mixed property constituted a house within the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2(1). Claimant non-resident leaseholder (H) served notice on the defendant landlord (B) under the Act to exercise its right to acquire the freehold of a property consisting of retail ground floor and residential upper floor accommodation. The question arose as to whether the property was a house according to s2(1) of the Act. H relied on the definition in "Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeon's Homes" ([1982] 2 EGLR 73). B contended that the property was not a house on the grounds that it was purpose-built, separated accommodation in a commercial setting with a non-resident leaseholder. "Held": claim allowed. Mixed residential and retail premises could by law constitute a house within s2(1) of the Act depending on the character of the premises at the time of the tenant's enfranchisement notice. "Tandon" applied. In this case a reasonable man, having read the definition of house in the Act and the "Tandon" judgment and knowing that the residence requirement for enfranchisement had been removed by the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, would say the property was a house within the 1967 Act.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note IKA210605
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element HAREFORD LTD V BARNET LBC
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(1)
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element TANDON V TRUSTEES OF SPURGEONS HOMES
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element COMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Landlord and tenant
9 (RLIN) 6252
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 20/06/2005   L130061 130061-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report