Case law: Freeguard v the Royal Bank of Scotland (Record no. 75432)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01544cab a2200205 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L130066 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050620n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u130066 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Ross, Jonathan |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Case law: Freeguard v the Royal Bank of Scotland |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Property Week |
| Volume/sequential designation | 70(23) 10 June 2005, 76(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Discusses the case "Freeguard v the Royal Bank of Scotland" ([2005] EWCA Civ 485) which considered a bank's responsibilities when selling mortgaged land. Freeguard claimed that the Royal Bank of Scotland had negligently sold a strip of land held as security for too low a price. She argued that as the only possible access for a development in a neighbouring field the land should, as a ransom strip, have fetched between 33% to 50% of the development value of the land as per the principle established in "Stokes v Cambridge" (J1184). As the whole site sold for £527 000, Freeguard claimed the value of strip of land should have been up to as much as £260 000 and the bank was in breach of its duty to act in good faith to the owner and to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable at the time it decides to sell. The court decided that as the bank could not have foreseen that the land would sell at double its actual value, it had not been negligent in accepting £60 000. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA040705 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | FREEGUARD V THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | STOKES V CAMBRIDGE |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 20/06/2005 | L130066 | 130066-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |