William Smith (Wakefield) Ltd v Parisride Ltd (Record no. 75521)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02102cab a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L130259 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050711n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u130259 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | William Smith (Wakefield) Ltd v Parisride Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2005] 24 EG 180-186(7) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2005] EWHC 462 (Admin), 23 March 2005. Considers whether a counter-notice for tribunal proceedings under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 s26 served concurrently with a notice requiring arbitration was rendered invalid by s28(4) of the Act. Claimant landlord (W) had given defendant tenant (P) notice to quit. P responded with a counter-notice for tribunal proceedings and a notice requiring arbitration without specifying which route he intended to take. W applied to the tribunal contending that the legislation did not allow dual avenues (arbitration and tribunal) to contest the notice to quit. Because P wanted the notice to be arbitrated, the counter-notice was ineffective pursuant to s28(4)(a) of the Act The tribunal refused consent to the operation of the notice to quit and rejected W's request to state a case in the High Court. "Held": application dismissed. The provisions in s28 of the Act could not be construed fairly as rendering a counter-notice invalid merely because the defendant had simultaneously given notice of reference to arbitration. The tribunal was entitled to take into account all the circumstances in determining whether P's failures were such that a fair landlord would not have insisted on possession. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA190705 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WILLIAM SMITH (WAKEFIELD) LTD V PARISRIDE LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986 S26 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986 S28(4) |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS ACT 1986 S28(2) |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES-BREACHING AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Host name | Iuhttp://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/462.html |
| Public note | View the decision free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 11/07/2005 | L130259 | 130259-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |