A limited use for limited companies? (Record no. 75552)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01668cab a2200241 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L130323 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050714n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u130323 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Mercer, Chris |
| 245 #2 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | A limited use for limited companies? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Letting Update Journal |
| Volume/sequential designation | 13(2) July 2005, 20-21(2) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Examines "Jones v Garnett" ([2005] STC (SCD) 9, unreported) known as the "Artic Systems" tax case, which has considerable implications for small businesses and some buy-to let landlords, particularly for anyone who is a director of a small limited company and perhaps part of a husband and wife operation. Artic Systems was a limited company owned by a husband and wife, where the husband drew a salary well below his earning power but received substantial dividends, half of which went to his wife on her 50% interest in the company. It was confirmed on appeal ([2005] EWHC 849 (Ch), The TImes 17 May 2005) that the dividends paid to the wife were income and therefore liable to tax. Argues that the case is another attack on the advantages of incorporation. Provides a number of tax tips particularly in respect of taking profits as dividends and concludes with advice on the situation arising from this case, which may be further appealed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA190705 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | INCOME AND CORPORATION TAXES ACT 1988 S660G |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | INCOME AND CORPORATION TAXES ACT 1988 S660A |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ARTIC SYSTEMS CASE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JONES V GARNETT (HMIT) (2004) |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JONES V GARNETT (HMIT) (2005) |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/07/2005 | L130323 | 130323-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |