Tug-of-war over costs (Record no. 75897)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01815cab a2200241 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L130982 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 050920n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u130982 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Jones, Simon |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Tug-of-war over costs |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (0536) 10 September 2005, 274-275(2) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Considers the new, albeit limited power introduced under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Sched 12 para 10 (4) for leasehold valuation tribunals (LVTs) to award costs in LVT applications. Describes how it has led to conflicting judgments in two recent cases: "Schilling v Canary Riverside Developments PTE Ltd" ([2005] PLSCS 102, L130219) and "Staghold v Takeda" ([2005] PLSCS 160)."Schilling" held that this provision would significantly restrict a landlord's right to recover any legal or professional fees incurred in connection with the LVT application whereas "Staghold" concluded that para 10(4) did not preclude the landlord's contractual right to recover legal and professional costs incurred in previous LVT and Lands Tribunal proceedings as a service charge. Both cases will probably be appealed. If "Schilling" is upheld, landlords will have to defend unmeritorious claims by leaseholders without being able to recover the costs of defending the claim. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA270905 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SCHILLING V CANARY RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | UNFAIR TERMS IN CONSUMER CONTRACTS REGULATIONS 1999 REG 5(2) |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | COMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002 SCHED 12 PARA 10(4 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S20C |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | STAGHOLD V TAKEDA |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT- DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-TRIBUNALS-LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNALS |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 20/09/2005 | L130982 | 130982-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |