Case news: (1) Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of London (2) Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery of Mercers in the City of London v (1)Intercede 1765 Ltd (2) Intercede 1766 Ltd (Record no. 75911)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01826cab a2200205 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field L131036
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 050922n2005 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u131036
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gordon, Warren
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Case news: (1) Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of London (2) Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery of Mercers in the City of London v (1)Intercede 1765 Ltd (2) Intercede 1766 Ltd
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2005
490 #0 - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Property Week
Volume/sequential designation 70(36) 9 September 2005, 67(1)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This case ([2005] EWHC 1691 (Ch), [2005] NPC 103) examined and interpreted a deed to decide on the height limit of a development. At the time of construction in the 1920s of the Lloyds building, a deed was entered into relating to both the Lloyds building and the Royal Exchange opposite. Following its sale in 2002, the Lloyds building was to be developed together with adjacent sites. Planning permission was obtained and the owner I entered into negotiations with C the owners of the Royal Exchange to modify the existing deed. Development works commenced but negotiations broke down. Now committed to following through with the planned development, I claimed that its plans did not exceed the height restriction. "Held:" that the development was not in breach of the deed. The court noted that some parts of the building could be higher, if stepped back from the front, and that elements of the original building were higher than stated in the deed.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note IKA270905
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element CORPORATION OF LONDON LBC V INTERCEDE 1765 AND ANOTHER
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2005/1691.html&query=intercede&method=all">https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2005/1691.html&query=intercede&method=all</a>
Public note View the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 22/09/2005   L131036 131036-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Journal article