R (on the application of Weir, Khattar and Kaner) v London Borough of Camden (Record no. 75964)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01942cab a2200181 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ##L131138 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 051003n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u131138 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | R (on the application of Weir, Khattar and Kaner) v London Borough of Camden |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2005] EWHC 1875 (Admin), 28 July 2005. Concerns the failure of a local planning authority to acknowledge an objection from another local planning authority before granting planning permission for the development of premises located on the boundary between the two authorities. The defendant local planning authority, Camden LBC (C), had received objections to the planning application from the local community association on grounds of amenity referring to noise, visitor numbers and highway safety issues. The City of Westminster (W), a statutory consultee as it exercised planning control on the other side of the boundary, also had concerns in respect of harm to residential amenity but did not submit any written objection by the end of the consultation period. C's development control sub-committee was unaware of W's objection when it granted planning permission. The claimants (WE) applied for judicial review contending that C had failed to have regard to a material consideration, W's objection and its terms. "Held": the permission should be quashed. C had failed to have regard to a material consideration namely W's objection and the terms of it. The committee might well have attached greater weight to the objections had it been aware that W supported them. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA111005 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | R V CAMDEN LBC EX P WEIR |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING APPLICATIONS |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/1875.html">https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/1875.html</a> |
| Public note | View the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 03/10/2005 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 131138-2001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |