An ambitious attempt (Record no. 75997)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01757cab a2200265 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ##L131239 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 051010n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u131239 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Erwin, Alan |
| 245 03 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | An ambitious attempt |
| 260 3# - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (0539) 1 October 2005, 131-132(2) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The construction industry is keen to adopt a single standard form. Questions whether the standard forms of appointment issued by professional bodies such as RIBA and the Association of Consulting Engineers can be justly called industry standard. Discusses "Munkenbeck and Marshall (a firm) v Harold" ([2005] EWHC 356 (TCC)) where the RIBA Standard Form of Agreement for the Appointment of an Architect (1999 Edition) received adverse judicial comment: 5.13 and 9.6 used unusual, onerous and unfair terms despite the fact that they formed part of profession-wide standard terms. Analyses the BPF Consultancy Agreement (see also L131227) and counters the view expressed by the competitor professional bodies that it is biased in favour of the client. Concludes that the BPF agreement, although not ideal, seems to work as well as the elusive one-size-fits all model. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA111005 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MUNKENBECK AND MARSHALL (A FIRM) V HAROLD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BLYTH AND BLYTH V CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BPF CONSULTANCY AGREEMENT |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | UNFAIR TERMS IN CONSUMER CONTRACTS REGULATIONS 1999 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SFA/99 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2005/356.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2005/356.html</a> |
| Public note | View the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 10/10/2005 | L131239 | 131239-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |