When is a profit lost? (Record no. 76004)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01621cab a2200205 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ##L131264 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 051013n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u131264 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Klein, Rudi |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | When is a profit lost? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 #0 - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Construction News |
| Volume/sequential designation | 6937 6 October 2005, 26(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Discusses the law relating to repudiation of a contract, where, although a contractor carries out work in accordance with the specification and programme, the client nevertheless terminates the contract prematurely. Although the issue has not been tested in the courts in this country, rulings in the USA and Australia may be relevant. In "Boomer v Muir" (24 P 2d 570 (1933)) the Supreme Court of California decided that a contractor was entitled not only to claim damages for breach of contract but also a quantum meruit, ie a reasonable or fair value for work carried out. In "Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Limited v Minister for Public Works" ((1992) 26 NSWLR 234) the New South Wales Court of Appeal held that the innocent party could elect either to sue for damages for breach of contract or a quantum meruit. The leading authority on the subject in this country, however, Keating on building contracts (ISBN 0421565306), states that a contractor does not have the option of ignoring the contract and claiming quantum meruit. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA251005 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BOOMER V MUIR |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS (ME) PTD LTD V MINISTER FOR PUBLIC WORK |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 13/10/2005 | L131264 | 131264-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |