Arbib v Earl Cadogan and similar appeals (Record no. 76054)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02026cab a2200241 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ##L131346
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 051021n2005 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u131346
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Arbib v Earl Cadogan and similar appeals
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2005
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. [2005] EWLands LRA 23 2004, 15 September 2005. Concerns the appropriate deferment rate to be applied to the reversionary value on the enfranchisement, or for an extended lease, of houses or flats. The six conjoined appeals against decisions of the London Leasehold Valuation Tribunal and the London Rent Assessment Panel relate to valuations pursuant to notice to acquire the freehold of houses under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s9(1C) and claims for collective enfranchisement under sched 6 to the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. Expert opinion was divided between an established minimum deferment rate of 6% and a lower rate of 4.5%. The court was asked to ascertain a hypothetical rate to apply to convert the current open market vacant possession value into a figure forming part of the sum that would have been realised by a willing seller under the necessary statutory assumptions. "Held": freeholders' appeals allowed, leaseholder's appeal dismissed. No binding convention exists that a fixed and constant 6% deferment rate should be universally used. Each deferment rate must be individually determined on the evidence.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note IKA251005
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S9(1C)
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 SCHED 6
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element CADOGAN ESTATES LTD V HOWS
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element LAND SECURITIES PLC V WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element GALLAGHER ESTATES LTD V WALKER
650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ARBIB V EARL CADOGAN
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2005/LRA_23_2004.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2005/LRA_23_2004.html</a>
Public note View the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Virtual Virtual Online 21/10/2005   ONLINE PUBLICATION 131346-2001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report