Aerlink Leisure Ltd (in liquidation) v First Secretary of State (Record no. 76057)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01890cab a2200193 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ##L131352 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 051024n2005 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u131352 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Aerlink Leisure Ltd (in liquidation) v First Secretary of State |
| 260 3# - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2005 |
| 490 #0 - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Property and Compensation Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2005] 3 P & C.R, 262-272(13) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | 2005] EWHC 3198 QBD, 21 December 2004. Concerns whether developers constructing a golf course failed to start construction before the deadline stipulated by the planning permission. Appeal by AL against an inspector's decision that the development had not commenced within the five-year period dictated by the planning permission. The local planning authority on appeal before an inspector contended that the planning permission had lapsed because no material start on implementing the permission had been made prior to the deadline. AL argued that the development had been initiated within the meaning of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s56 which states that development is deemed to be begun on the earliest date that a material operation is carried out. AL contended that pegging out a private access road (although the pegs had been removed as they were a possible danger to grazing livestock) and stripping of topsoil from some of the land constituted material operations. "Held": appeal allowed. The inspector's decision in respect of the pegging amounting to a material operation was wrong in law and the reasons for rejecting the stripping of topsoil as proof of commencement of construction were flawed. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA251005 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S56 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288 |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING APPLICATIONS-PLANNING APPEALS |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 24/10/2005 | L131352 | 131352-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |