Warnborough Ltd v Garmite Ltd (Record no. 76396)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02134cab a2200265 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ##L132314 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 060125n2006 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u132314 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Warnborough Ltd v Garmite Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2006 |
| 490 #0 - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | [2006] 03 EG 121 (CS) (1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2006] EWHC 10 CL, 12 January 2006. Considers whether an option agreement fell within the court's jurisdiction to grant relief from forfeiture. W sought performance of a contract for the sale and purchase of a property following W's exercising of an option to repurchase the properties granted to W by G. Upon completion the purchase price was left outstanding, secured by a charge on the property. At the same time G granted W an option with specific conditions to repurchase the property. G fell into arrears with payments under the charge and both parties then agreed a replacement option. G fell further into arrears and W sought to exercise the option. G contended that: (1) the option was unenforceable as it was a clog on the equity of redemption; (2) it was in the nature of a penalty or provision for forfeiture and (3) that the court should grant relief from forfeiture. "Held": claim allowed. As the transaction was a sale and purchase and not a mortgage the rule on clogs did not apply. There was no basis for the estoppel defence. The provisions of the option agreements were not in the nature of a penalty and there were no grounds for relief from forfeiture. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA310106 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WARNBOROUGH LTD V GARMITE LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PENNINGTON V CROSSLEY |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JOBSON V JOBSON |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SHILOH SPINNERS LTD V HARDING |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DUNLOP PNEUMATIC TYRE CO LTD V NEW GARAGE AND MOTOR CO LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | STARSIDE PROPERTIES V MUSTAPHA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ZIM ISRAEL NAVIGATION LTD V EFFY SHIPPING CORPORATION |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TANKEXPRESS A/S V COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE BELGE DES PETROLES SA |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-FORFEITURE OF BUSINESS TENANCIES |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 25/01/2006 | L132314 | 132314-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |