R (on the application of Springhall) v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council (Record no. 76417)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02051cab a2200205 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ##L132377 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 060131n2006 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u132377 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | R (on the application of Springhall) v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2006 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2006] EWCA Civ, 24 January 2006. Considers whether or not the decision in "R v Harrow LBC ex p Carlton-Conway" ([2002] EWCA Civ 927, (2002) 3 PLR 77) laid down any general principles as to the legality of a planning officer exercising delegated powers of decision-making, where there is any real issue about the meaning or application of a planning policy. Appeal by S against a decision dismissing his claim for judicial review of a decision made by an officer of R, granting planning permission for S's neighbour to demolish a building on his land and to replace it with a new building. S had objected on the grounds that the existing building was of townscape merit and that R's supplementary planning guidance contained a presumption against demolition. The application was not reserved to the planning committee. The judge agreed with the officer's determination that the proposed development complied with the supplementary planning guidance and concluded that the decision in "Carlton-Conway" did not constitute a general principle. "Held": appeal dismissed. The decision in "Carlton-Conway" should not be read as laying down any general principle. There were no grounds for the courts to intrude into the interpretation of planning policy short of illegality or Wednesbury irrationality. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA310106 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | R V RICHMOND UPON THAMES LBC EX P SPRINGHALL |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | R V HARROW LBC EX P CARLTON-CONWAY |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WEDNESBURY PRINCIPLES |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING ENFORCEMENT |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/19.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/19.html</a> |
| Public note | View the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 31/01/2006 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 132377-2001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |